Parents contest ban from school campus
by Melody Dareing
20 days ago | 1542 views | 22 22 comments | 17 17 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Parents of a kindergartner at Van Wert Elementary School say they are demanding answers from the Polk County Board of Education about why the girl’s father remains banned from the school.

Louis and Angela Arant said they will be approaching board members in their meeting next Tuesday to talk face-to-face about the situation. The Polk School District Board of Education meets at 6:30 p.m. at the central office on South College Street.

The decision to attend the meeting comes after an email to board members, phone calls to school officials and a certified letter demanding a response, the Arants said.

They said they have hired attorneys as well.

Louis Arant has been banned from Van Wert Elementary since Sept. 24, when Principal Sherrie Cox issued a criminal trespass complaint against him. Polk County School Superintendent Marvin Williams said it was a joint decision between himself and Cox.

The Arants said school officials have overstepped their bounds and are causing severe distress in their family. They also said school officials have never offered a clear reason for the ban.

Louis Arant said this school year started out typically with their youngest child, Julie, 5, starting school. Arant is a stay-at-home dad because of a physical disability, while Mrs. Arant works. They have an older daughter in Rockmart Middle School as well and their oldest daughter works at a local fast-food restaurant.

Because of the family situation, Arant actively participates in the girls’ school functions and deals with any educational issues. He said he was taking Julie to school when he noticed something was wrong with the safety of student drop off and pick up.

"The first time, my daughter almost ran out in traffic," he said.

At that time, the new school had two lanes of traffic letting students out and picking them up. Arant said students were going between parked cars. He said there was a second instance where his daughter could have been hit by a car inching forward.

That is when he approached the principal.

"I told them that if they keep doing this with these little kids, someone is going to get hurt," he said.

Arant then talked to Buddy Harrison with the Polk County Board of Education and to Williams after that, but the couple said it seemed to fall on deaf ears. Mrs. Arant said she talked with Cox also, was told that their opinions were welcomed and either was allowed to observe the drop-off and pick-up to note any safety issues.

Arant said he decided to accept the invitation to observe Sept. 24 after he dropped his daughter off at the school door. He said he parked in a separate lot to avoid a traffic problem, leaned up against a wall to watch while talking to his wife on his cell phone.

According to Arant, the vice principal approached him, accused him of taking pictures of children and ordered him to leave before police were called. Arant said he left, but was given the criminal trespass citation by Rockmart Police Chief Keith Sorrells later.

Arant said he never took any pictures and offered his cell phone to school officials to check. He said they refused.

School officials are, for the most part, mum about the incident saying it is a confidential school matter. However, both Cox and Williams said it wasn’t a matter to be taken lightly.

"I been a school administrator for 13 years," Cox said. "I’ve never had to ban a parent from school. It’s pretty unique."

Sorrells said this is the first time he has issued a criminal trespass warning for a parent at a school. He said such warnings are typically issued against a shoplifter to prevent them from returning to a store.

The police report from the incident leading to the ban states Arant caused a disturbance or problems "almost every morning since school started." Some of the accusations levied in the report are that he has blocked traffic, standing in front of the school, ranting and yelling.

The report states the situation was worsening because parents were not leaving the school after dropping off their kids until Arant left.

The Arants claim details listed in the report are false. They said Arant had dropped off his daughter 12 times from the beginning of school until the Sept. 24 incident, with his wife sharing the responsibility, so he wasn’t there every day. He also denies other allegations, stating he parked in an adjacent lot and walked his daughter to the school to ensure her safety in the traffic.

Cox said in an interview that Arant did park elsewhere, didn’t routinely hang around the school, didn’t yell or use profanity and didn’t pose a physical threat to anyone. Cox declined to say exactly what Arant did to warrant a ban other to say it was a "safety issue."

"Some parents can become very angry and not use profanity, but another parent sees it and makes them think their child is unsafe," she said.

Williams also said Arant wasn’t involved in any physical altercation, didn’t threaten anyone, didn’t use vulgarity, wasn’t carrying a weapon and wasn’t yelling.

"I just expect a certain type of behavior on school property," he said, adding that he has discussed this with the school board and they support him in the decision.

Williams said there wasn’t a specific board policy outlining what behavior would get a parent banned from a school. In this instance, it was a discretionary matter, he said.

The Arants said this is posing a real logistic problem for them. As it is, the oldest daughter has had to pick up their 5-year-old because the couple doesn’t feel she is old enough to ride the bus. So, their oldest has to take off from work to go pick up her sister.

Scheduling changes at work will result in the child leaving school 30 minutes early every day, which the Arants fear will lead to a truancy issue.

Meanwhile, the school has changed the way parents drop off and pick up their children. Williams said parents are directed to drive in a single lane in the morning and two lanes in the afternoon. The change is safer because it is dark in the morning when kids arrive, Williams said.

The Arants said they are happy for the change and that it proves Arant was raising valid concerns.
comments (22)
« Enforcer wrote on Monday, Nov 23 at 01:58 PM »
I do not have the time to correct your mistakes
« Montezuma wrote on Monday, Nov 16 at 04:49 PM »
Enforcer, I fail to see any substance to your comment. If you are going to accuse someone of failing to provide correct information, then you need to follow up with the correction.

I certainly hope that you do not fail at your job as bad as you have failed here.
« Enforcer wrote on Monday, Nov 16 at 01:31 PM »
Once again Montezuma does not have a clue.
« Montezuma wrote on Wednesday, Nov 11 at 08:26 PM »
Wild and Enforcer: Just where do you think the media gets its information? The sky? Unless it is an active investigation, classified information, or personnel information, a government agency cannot withhold any information. Even a first year American Government student would know this.

Now, if your department has it written in their SOP that only certain officers may talk to the press about official matters, then you must follow those rules. The fact remains, oh uneducated one, that a law enforcement department is not barred from talking to the media, or others about issues they have been involved in. This also applies to other government employees.

I will also have you know, Wild, that learned what I know about the law at GSD(Georgia School of the Deaf) where Georgia POST held their basic peace officer certification facility. I also learned about the law in the course of my education, and will learn the most when I move on to graduate school.

I have never been to prison and never will do anything to put me there. The fact is that I was hurt on the job(in law enforcement) and decided enter into college to embark on a a different career. I value the time I spent in my previous career as well as the various people I met in the course of my duties, but I am now on to bigger and better things.
« Veteran69 wrote on Sunday, Nov 08 at 12:41 PM »
This sounds like a case of a few obscure school administrators in a podunk town flexing their egos. It makes no sense to ban a parent from the school for such a long period of time unless he or she has broken the law or threatened a child, parent, or a faculty member
« Veteran69 wrote on Sunday, Nov 08 at 12:33 PM »
« Enforcer wrote on Friday, Nov 06 at 04:28 PM »
I would have to agree with you Wild. A government agency and police can not go to the media and tell everything that a person did. That is for the court room. A person is presumed innocent until guilty.
« Montezuma wrote on Friday, Nov 06 at 11:04 AM »
Do not email, call. People can ignore emails, but it is hard to ignore someone who is blowing up a phone(metaphorically, not literally...for the crazy people). Persistence does works.

You need to contact the local school board and the city or country commissioners, depending on where you live and which government services the buses your child rides. Politicians tend to be more open to citizen concerns, as it is the citizens that vote to control their job. They also have the authority to act on this issue for you.
« Montezuma wrote on Friday, Nov 06 at 08:31 AM »
Well said, AMERICANMADE.

Wild, I actually know a lot about the law, as I have a background in law enforcement. Unless you are a police officer, or were a police officer, then I have zero interest in your point of view. I can actually tell a lot from your post and it is obvious to me that you know nothing about the law. It is also obvious to me that you either do not have a college education, or you slept through the whole four years. ...or was that the whole two years while you were at Coosa Valley Tech(or whatever the name of the place is now). I would not be surprised if you told me you are one of the school officials in this story.

I never said that law enforcement cannot keep information secret for a time. It is a requirement for them to do their job. I also never said that other government officials cannot keep information confidential, as they would need to in order to do their jobs. What I said was that they cannot continually keep information from the public, as the public has a right...no, a duty to know exactly what their governments are doing. If law enforcement could not comment on a case, then there would never be anything written about it in newspapers. No one would ever discuss details with television media outlets, and we would not be here discussing this right now.

This is not a criminal case and there is little to nothing to investigate, in regards to Mr. Arant and new charges against him. Of course, there is more to investigate about how this incident occured and why school officials decided to act inappropriately, if this is how the incidient occured. I want to know more and, if Mr. Arant really did nothing wrong, I demand that this "ban" be lifted.

You know, if I were you, I would choose my next words carefully. You are bound to do nothing more than make yourself look less and less educated. There is a good, and oft misquoted and over-quoted Mark Twain quote that really is fitting here. Since I do not care to use cliches, I will hold back from using the quote. You certainly are welcome to your opinion, regardless of how misinformed it is. The problem, for you, is that it is just your opinion, which seems to have no basis in reality.
« AMERICANMADE wrote on Friday, Nov 06 at 01:07 AM »
Bottom line is this could be any one of us tax paying citizens!

As we've read both Cox and Williams state that Mr. Arant did not yell, didn't use profanity, didn't threaten, wasn't in a physical altercation, wasn't carrying a weapon, and didn't pose a physical threat to anyone. Well then it seems to me that it's the school officials who created the problem to begin with, and are now causing a disturbance for the Arant family.

Or was it a disturbance because Mr. Arant noticed the safety issue before our own educators? Why didn't our school officials realize children walking between running vehicles was unsafe? Well apparently they did after Mr. Arant's complaint. But it still doesn't make sense why they only changed it in the morning? I think the school is taking an unnecessary risk with our children by not changing it in the afternoon as well. Why would they voluntarily risk another child. We lost one child in our community this year, why would we chance losing another?

If I was the Mr. Williams and the BoE, I would welcome concerns and complaints regarding all issues especially ones related to Safety! My opinion is too many of our school officials treat parents like we are their students. Maybe since they couldn't expel Mr. Arant from school they just decided to ban him since he didn't meet whatever type of behavior Mr. Williams expects on his campus. So just remember you could get banned too.

I don't feel a parent who was and is standing up for what he believes in, and who didn't do anything to cause a disturbance should be banned from taking care of his daughter. Who do our officials think they are? They too often forget who elects them or foots their paycheck!

Why not just lift the ban and apologize to the Arant family for the hardship that has been brought upon them for no apparent reason!!!

« AMERICANMADE wrote on Thursday, Nov 05 at 10:25 PM »
« Montezuma wrote on Wednesday, Nov 04 at 02:04 PM »
Lawsuits do not have to focus on monetary gains. Asking for $1 and an apology is what I would aim for, along with the removal of the criminal trespass complaint111.

Wild: You talking about "uneducated readers" and you just showed yourself to be one. No agent of the government, be it law enforcement or school official, has a right to keep information private or confidential, except during an active investigation(which I doubt this is). There are numerous laws and acts that stop this very thing from happening.

Do we know everything from this article to be factual? No. The problem is that both sides have commented and none of the information provided shows good cause for the school to seek to ban this parent from entering upon the school grounds. The fact is that each side will put their own spin on it; it is just a fact of life. Even the most objective people tend to discuss issues with their own prejudice.

You act as if every citizen that comments on law enforcement, or other government action, is telling a lie and that the only truth-tellers are within the various government entities around us. It sounds to me as if, from the information provided, that the police chief did not investigate the incident thoroughly and has violated Mr. Arant's rights without just cause. I believe that the incident requires more investigation and if the ban was rightfully given, then it needs to be enforced. If it is found, by an objective, outside party, that Mr. Arant did nothing wrong, then the ban needs to be overturned and "heads need to roll".

If the police had shown up at the school and asked Mr. Arant to leave while they discover the truth of the matter(if, in fact, Mr. Arant was invited to observe the school by officials), then that would be ok. They are within their(police) right to do that to maintain the peace. If this article shows any misinformation, it is the other parents at the school that accused Mr. Arant of being belligerent, while the officials at the school admitted that Mr. Arant was not. If I were Mr. Arant, I would have demanded that the VP contact police, so that I could argue my side and provide the police with the information about being invited by officials to observe the school.

Wild, do not comment on the law when you obviously have no clue what you are talking about.
« EWInsight wrote on Wednesday, Nov 04 at 04:02 AM »
Correction:

When I left my first post.. I was assuming a different person was the VP of Van Wert School with Mrs. Cox. I do not know John and would not care to speak of him in any way. I therefore apologeticly pull any opinions of the V.P. stated or assumed by myself or the reader.

It does still seem to be a simple miscommunication that ended up being a " its done so lets stand by it" decision that has become a nightmare. I hope it can be handled like adults and not by the courts. Childrens safety and parents rights at the school should not be a court room decision, it should be policy.